If you saw the episode (and even if you didn't)--John Stewart was declared the victor in the battle of wits. What I saw was Jim Cramer--a guy with a larger than life personality--reduced to a shell of a TV host--it made me wonder if he was pinned as the scapegoat for CNBC? Absent from the interview were Cramer's constant ravings, explosive body language and in-your-face jabs. His key messages were reduced to "I made mistakes" and "I was lied to"--these were the repetitive key messages that were uttered as he asked for forgiveness and vowed to become a better advisor. How could the media relations experts at CNBC allow Cramer to make such a fool of himself--unless it was intentional.
I think that key messages can kill the messenger--especially when that is their intention.
i agree I think it was intentional
ReplyDeleteNot sure on this. He came off a little unprepared to me...or outmatched. Regardless, CNBC took a dose of humility and that can't hurt anyone in today's network world.
ReplyDeletei believe that it was intentional too. he seemed like a puppy who got scolded.
ReplyDelete